Skip to main content

Facebook Fights U.S. Pressure Over WikiLeaks

Facebook’s fight against government pressure to cut ties with WikiLeaks and release the personal data of those users might seem to contradict how the social network operates with respect to third-party developers, although neither happens without permission.
Facebook spokesman Andrew Noyes told InfoWorld that the social network is “required to regularly push back against over-broad requests for user records. … in most cases we are able to convince the party issuing legal process to withdraw the overbroad request, but if they do not we fight the matter in court” and have a history of success in those cases.
This is exactly the kind of responsible approach Daniel Ellsberg urged a room of Silicon Valley executives to take at a Churchill Club event in Santa Clara, Calif., last Wednesday. Ellsberg, the man who in 1971 leaked the Pentagon Papers -– a top secret study about the U.S. government’s role in the Vietnam war — said companies that store our personal data have the “responsibility” to push back against the government’s pressure to release said information.
As you probably know by now, the U.S. government has been eager to shut down WikiLeaks and has in turn put pressure on private companies such as Visa, Mastercard, Amazon, and Facebook to cut ties with the controversial website, although the social network didn’t cave in like the others.
“People in this audience have the ability to decide that they are ready to take a risk in their lives to fight to preserve democracy in this country and to preserve us from total transparency to our executive branch,” Ellsberg said at the event in Santa Clara.
Facebook wouldn’t comment on how many of these third-party requests it has received concerning the release of personal data, but admitted that the number has been growing. The Electronic Frontier Foundation, which recently collected copies of policy guidelines from 13 online companies -– including Facebook –- said that the social network has struggled to maintain a coherent, consistent set of policies to determine how and when to release personal data to third parties, including the government. In fact, according to the EFF, the social network’s 2010 guidelines are too vague and harm the company’s transparency.
Do you think Facebook has been proactive about protecting consumer privacy, or inconsistent?

Comments

  1. Υоur post provіdеѕ veгified helρful to myself.
    Ιt’s extremely eԁuсаtional anԁ you really are obviously гeallу expеrienced іn thiѕ rеgion.
    Yοu hаve got opened up my own eye tο be аble to
    varуing oρiniοn of thіѕ kind
    of topic togеther wіth interеsting and rеlіable cοntent.


    My blog post; buy phentermine
    Also visit my web blog : phentermine

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Top 5 Women Who Impacted Technology in 2010

Katie Stanton, International Strategist for Twitter Katie Stanton has impressively long names of companies in her resume. They include the White House, Google Inc, and her latest addition is Twitter. Her remit is working on Twitter’s international strategy and her experience in social media will be a key asset to the company. Katie has a history of working in technology, and her knowledge of departmental laws will help Twitter work alongside government agencies, as she’ll be spearheading the free information approach, especially after the Wikileaks incident. Stanton has been a key player in the techsphere for some time, and this extends to her private life. Following the Haiti disaster she worked with a group of engineers to create a free texting service to help those in need and she is constantly in demand as an expert in both social media and government policy.
Caterina Fake, Co-Founder of Flickr and Hunch Despite having a surname which sounds like a pseudonym for a spy (it’…

AT&T MiFi 2372 review

In the week or so that I have been testing the AT&T MiFi 2372 by Novatel Wireless, it has already saved no less than three lives. First, it saved my cable guy’s life. You see, Time Warner Cable provides the worst home Internet service I have ever experienced. I can’t even think of a close second. If providing terrible home Internet service was a sport, Time Warner Cable would be on its tenth consecutive undefeated season. Forget the fact that my upload speed is capped at 60Kbps and I’m lucky if I can get half that — it has been months since I’ve gone through a full day without at least one service interruption. Months. Unfortunately, Time Warner Cable has an exclusive contract with my building so I have no choice but to endure its abysmal service. Last week, as a Time Warner Cable technician entered my home for the sixth time in two months, I realized that this certainly would have spelled serious trouble had it not been for my trusty new back up device. Before the Mi…

Evolution Of Computer Virus [infographic]