Skip to main content

Open alternative to Facebook

 Last fortnight, a blog post by Facebook's developer support team nailed it. Though the social networking firm backtracked after privacy rights activists cried foul, the seemingly innocuous announcement that application developers can access your home addresses and phone numbers (should you use their app) set the alarm bells ringing.

The message was clear: your data, once uploaded on Internet services, is not yours anymore. Enter Diaspora.

Diaspora, an open and distributed social network, offers an escape hatch for those who want to stay networked, yet find the loose privacy practices discomfiting. In its early alpha testing stage, Diaspora now offers just what was promised when the four geeks behind this ‘free' project released its code four months ago.

Dubbed the ‘Facebook Killer,' Diaspora offers all that Facebook does —friends, status updates, photo sharing, linking messages between Twitter and Facebook, and the works — and two critical features that Facebook will not: privacy and control. And it is not just about just about customising settings or tweaking controls; for, Diaspora's inherent ‘decentralised' architecture puts you in control right from the start by liberating you from the servers that store your data, owned, of course, by corporations.
Decentralised pods

Diaspora runs on a network of connected servers, or ‘pods.' These network nodes can be hosted by Diaspora users — the ‘how to' page on Diaspora blog takes you through the slightly technical process of setting one up. But it isn't that every user must set up a pod: you can join any existing pod running the Diaspora software. Unlike Facebook, where the ‘iron and steel' or cloud is owned by the company, this pod could be run/owned by your friend, office, university or — if none of the above — the freedom-loving, non-corporate types at Diaspora. So while you enjoy the fruits of social networking, the pods ensure that your data remains within the nodes you control.

The first impression — they are still adding features by the day — is that it is clean and gives you more control. Take, for instance, ‘aspects.' Diaspora lets you group your friends into different aspects (like buddy groups), so you can choose which aspect can view your messages/photos. Closer to how we interact offline, where what we say more often than not depends on who we're talking to, aspect-specific posting means that what you're posting to your friends can't be viewed by your work colleagues, boss, family or whoever it is that you choose to address.

Privacy concerns have previously led to open source initiatives such as Identica and GNU Social. What sets Diaspora apart is the attempt to decentralise.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Top 5 Women Who Impacted Technology in 2010

Katie Stanton, International Strategist for Twitter Katie Stanton has impressively long names of companies in her resume. They include the White House, Google Inc, and her latest addition is Twitter. Her remit is working on Twitter’s international strategy and her experience in social media will be a key asset to the company. Katie has a history of working in technology, and her knowledge of departmental laws will help Twitter work alongside government agencies, as she’ll be spearheading the free information approach, especially after the Wikileaks incident. Stanton has been a key player in the techsphere for some time, and this extends to her private life. Following the Haiti disaster she worked with a group of engineers to create a free texting service to help those in need and she is constantly in demand as an expert in both social media and government policy.
Caterina Fake, Co-Founder of Flickr and Hunch Despite having a surname which sounds like a pseudonym for a spy (it’…

AT&T MiFi 2372 review

In the week or so that I have been testing the AT&T MiFi 2372 by Novatel Wireless, it has already saved no less than three lives. First, it saved my cable guy’s life. You see, Time Warner Cable provides the worst home Internet service I have ever experienced. I can’t even think of a close second. If providing terrible home Internet service was a sport, Time Warner Cable would be on its tenth consecutive undefeated season. Forget the fact that my upload speed is capped at 60Kbps and I’m lucky if I can get half that — it has been months since I’ve gone through a full day without at least one service interruption. Months. Unfortunately, Time Warner Cable has an exclusive contract with my building so I have no choice but to endure its abysmal service. Last week, as a Time Warner Cable technician entered my home for the sixth time in two months, I realized that this certainly would have spelled serious trouble had it not been for my trusty new back up device. Before the Mi…

Evolution Of Computer Virus [infographic]