Skip to main content

Google Says Microsoft’s Latest Android Lawsuit Threatens Innovation

 
Over the last six months, Microsoft has targeted several of Google’s Android partners with patent infringement lawsuits, but has yet to go after Google itself.
The latest example is Microsoft’s campaign against Barnes & Noble, which it says violates Microsoft patents in its Nook e-book reader that runs Android. The company has also sued Foxconn and Inventec, hardware manufacturers that build components for the Nook. The latest lawsuit follows last October’s Microsoft attack on Motorola, another key Google Android partner.
Taken together, these developments suggest that Microsoft is waging a proxy battle against Google by targeting its partners, while holding fire on Google itself, perhaps wary of a full-on Battle Royale with the web-search juggernaut.
But that’s not the case, a Microsoft spokesperson told Wired.com.
“Microsoft has taken these actions against Barnes & Noble, Foxconn and Inventec because they are commercializing products that infringe our patented innovations,” the Microsoft representative said. “In the technology industry, device manufacturers are the point in the chain of commerce at which steps are taken to clear third party patent rights.”
In other words, Microsoft says it is targeting the device makers, not Google itself, because they are the ones bringing infringing products to market.
“The Android platform infringes a number of Microsoft’s patents, and companies shipping Android devices must respect our intellectual property rights,” the spokesperson added.
Still, it’s hard not to see Microsoft’s claims against Google’s Android partners as a roundabout attack on Google. After all, Microsoft appears to be asserting the right to issue patent licenses for one of its competitors’ signature products — and make no mistake, Android may be open-source, but it is very much a Google product.
And Google sees Microsoft’s actions as enough of a threat that it felt compelled to issue a statement objecting to the lawsuit.
“Sweeping software patent claims like Microsoft’s threaten innovation,” Google said. “While we are not a party to this lawsuit, we stand behind the Android platform and the partners who have helped us to develop it.”
Microsoft has been losing market share in the mobile space to Android, as well as Apple’s iPhone.
“Microsoft should focus on innovating,” TechDirt’s Mike Masnick observed. “Not bitching about what competitors are doing better than it did.”
Time will tell whether Microsoft ultimately feels compelled to go after Google itself, or will remain content to target the company’s weaker partners.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Top 5 Women Who Impacted Technology in 2010

Katie Stanton, International Strategist for Twitter Katie Stanton has impressively long names of companies in her resume. They include the White House, Google Inc, and her latest addition is Twitter. Her remit is working on Twitter’s international strategy and her experience in social media will be a key asset to the company. Katie has a history of working in technology, and her knowledge of departmental laws will help Twitter work alongside government agencies, as she’ll be spearheading the free information approach, especially after the Wikileaks incident. Stanton has been a key player in the techsphere for some time, and this extends to her private life. Following the Haiti disaster she worked with a group of engineers to create a free texting service to help those in need and she is constantly in demand as an expert in both social media and government policy.
Caterina Fake, Co-Founder of Flickr and Hunch Despite having a surname which sounds like a pseudonym for a spy (it’…

AT&T MiFi 2372 review

In the week or so that I have been testing the AT&T MiFi 2372 by Novatel Wireless, it has already saved no less than three lives. First, it saved my cable guy’s life. You see, Time Warner Cable provides the worst home Internet service I have ever experienced. I can’t even think of a close second. If providing terrible home Internet service was a sport, Time Warner Cable would be on its tenth consecutive undefeated season. Forget the fact that my upload speed is capped at 60Kbps and I’m lucky if I can get half that — it has been months since I’ve gone through a full day without at least one service interruption. Months. Unfortunately, Time Warner Cable has an exclusive contract with my building so I have no choice but to endure its abysmal service. Last week, as a Time Warner Cable technician entered my home for the sixth time in two months, I realized that this certainly would have spelled serious trouble had it not been for my trusty new back up device. Before the Mi…

facebook vs google+